Thursday, January 2, 2014

Highlights of the day from the blogosphere

A few blogs talked about how other countries are doing. No positive reports, all negative.

China is apparently not doing as well as it should be. Brazil is only barely exporting more than it is importing, and India is fighting off a big deficit. This is all from memory, I still need to work on a better way to keep track of key points as I read blogs, which are not as easy to look back on.

In the US construction is doing very well, better than it has in a long time.

In non-investing news:
I was disappointed to hear that the US dropped many tax credits that were green initiatives- like supporting train commuting, wind power, and energy efficient buildings. Also, even though I am currently not a teacher, it was sad to see the teacher supply credit end.

It was interesting to read about the possibility of geoengineering to counteract the green house effect, but if we start it, as a world, we can't stop it again without causing worse problems.

Wednesday, January 1, 2014

Watch the Watch

Ezra Klein recently ran a post about a Swiss watch factory fire. I found it interesting that watch sales, particularly of mechanical, Swiss watches are doing exceptionally well lately.

Personally, I haven't worn a watch in forever, as my phone performs that function for me. Yet, according to this article, a nice Swiss watch is on the rise both as a fashion accessory, and as the gift of choice in business and government.

Swiss watches corner the market on mechanical watches, with Swatch being the main company making the components. Also, Swatch is increasingly protective about even selling their components to other companies, so they are poised to continue to profit from the increasing demand for a nice Swiss watch.

December Money Magazine

Though there were many interesting articles in this issue, many of them do not help my key focus, which is looking at where money should be invested, and information that could provide insight on that front.

One of the main investing articles talked about how in spite of the recession, the vice stocks, the ones for gambling, smoking and alcohol continued to do well. On this point in particular, I found it interesting that many of the alcohol sales are not from the cheap brands, but instead from the more expensive, quality brands. This actually coincides with what I have observed from my husband's family, where they would all prefer to spend more for a better alcohol than waste their money and calories on a cheap drink.

The article stated that Diageo, which produces Johnnie Walker, Guiness and Ketel One is trading at 18 times 2013 earnings. The competitors are actually slightly higher, but this particular company has more room to grow because it sells more overseas than its competitors.

Later in the article, it stated that if you don't want to invest in these areas based on principle, you have more of a challenge, but organic food makers might be a good area to look at. The two they named are Hain Celestial and Whole Foods. The article states that both of these companies have good return on capital, healthy recurring revenue and great projected growth rates.

I know that my family does prefer to shop organic, and I know many of my friends do as well. Based on nothing but my opinion, I think that as more people learn about what chemicals are in their products, and possibly more studies showing the effects of these chemicals on our bodies, more people will try to switch to organic products if they can afford to do so.

 There was a different article that truthfully confused me quite a bit, but I'm sure I will learn more as I go. This article was discussing the difference between a traditional index and a fundamental index. From what I understand, the key difference is the factors on which the stocks are chosen. It stated that there was an extra return for value stocks, and fundamental indexes tend to have more of those. Also, smaller stocks apparently outperform over long periods.

As I understand it, the main value of an index is that it allows you to diversify without active management, which is choosing all your own stocks and following them individually. It sounds like the fundamental index is somewhat of a hybrid, with some of the benefits of active management, while retaining the safety of an index.

The magazine recommended Europe, as their economy is expected to expand 1% in 2014. It also recommended investing in technology, as business spending is supposed to pick up.

The Pitch

I will be the first to admit my ignorance about all things financial that were not told to me by my father.

But I can read and summarize key things that I am told by experts, and relay that information on this blog.

Somehow, reading Money Magazine yesterday was not as painful as I thought, and there were nuggets of information that might be useful to someone who doesn't often have downtime to just read.

Here is the pitch:

If I have a financial backer, I will subscribe to Money, The Economist and one other financial magazine of the backer's choice, as well as follow three reputable financial blogs.

I will learn what I can from these sources and use the blog platform to recap, summarize and comment on what I learn. I will leave it to my backer to decide what, if anything, to do with the information I share.

My hope is that in this small way, I will be accomplishing my backer's wish for someone to keep him abreast of the current trends and assist in reaching his yearly financial goals.

Other than covering the cost of the print sources, no other compensation will be needed, as I am already being financially rewarded in various ways.

Later today, I will post on the December issue of Money.